Analysis of the Mobile App Analytics Landscape

Posted by Mobile Web Analytics | Posted in Case Studies, Web Analytics | Posted on 11-03-2010

0

When developing AppClix, we decided in advance that the only way to really understand the needs of the users would be to actually create mobile applications and put them up for sale in the app store.

Through another company of mine, we created 4 iPhone apps. During the development, we learned all about iPhone app analytics and how our competitors work. We saw was was missing from existing solutions, and what was frustrating us.

When we put the apps in the iPhone app store on iTunes, we instantly saw what sales and marketing information was needed that was also not available easily in a single reporting solution.

Each of our apps has both AppClix, as well as one competitor installed for direct comparison of data.

We are in the process of doing specific posts outlining our experience with each of the apps and competitors that can be found at the links below. We also evaluated a few others and are waiting on app store approval.

In this post we will discuss things that are not specific to one provider.

The first issue we found right from the start is that it can be extremely uncomfortable compiling a third party dependency into our applications. As many of us know from the AppLoop experience, companies go out of business. We have also found out through our experience that there can be serious delays in data reporting by some providers.

Well what do we do then? One of our apps that uses Pinch Media has not had data refreshed in over 11 days. Well our solution to this issue for those larger developers that want their own solution with NO DEPENDENCY on anyone else is a turnkey user installed, or cloud hosted system. More on this later.

Right away while evaluating all the solutions, we noticed that the dashboard presentation of all of the providers is extremely lacking. Flurry and Pinch Media have these “Web 2.0” interfaces that are all graphical and pretty but do not provide a simple concise display of information. Here is a comparison of the dashboards of a few. Click for full size.

flurry.png pinchmedia.png AppClix Dashboard

As a developer and marketer, we want to see relevant information easily. This is not possible with these other solutions. Being the first, and leader does not mean you can provide an inferior product. Then again, you get waht you pay for . Also the drill down pages are just as lacking in content and valuable information.

Here is a comparison of the “By Date” detail pages. Notice how Pinch Media has these HUGH numbers on the page. What’s that about? Also not how both Flurry and Pinch Media only show one metric at a time. You have to drop down menus and change pages to view the other metrics (also one at a time). Who can use this?

AppClixByDate.pngpinchByDatepng.pngFlurryByDate.png

I was very disappointed when I saw how these products present the data. We found the same issues with Mobile Web Analytics when developing Mobilytics.

Please visit our more specific posts comparing these solutions and what we found.

If anyone is interested in beta testing AppClix, please contact us.

Copyright Mobile Web Analytics – Analysis of the Mobile App Analytics Landscape

  • Share/Bookmark

MobileWebAnalytics Blog Has Changed to Mobile Analytics Today!

Posted by Mobile Web Analytics | Posted in Case Studies, Web Analytics | Posted on 11-03-2010

0

For the last 6 months we have been changing the direction of Mobilytics. We have recently entered AppClix into beta, which we consider to be the ULTIMATE mobile application analytics and reporting solution available. With that change we are expanding our blog to include posts and news on all mobile analytics, not just mobile web related. Over the next few days we will be putting up a number of posts we have written recently that have been waiting in the queue.

While developing AppClix, we have done extensive research and testing of our competitors applications. In order to really understand these products, we also developed a number of iPhone applications through another company of mine called Millennium Studios. We are currently developing Blackberry App World and Android Market apps and are looking for beta testers in those areas as well.

Four of these apps are now in the iTunes store and are producing invaluable data for our development and testing. Stay tuned for more posts about AppClix and some detailed analysis of the mobile app analytics Landscape.

AppClix is not just an application analytics solution like Flurry, Pinch Media, Localytics, MobClix and others. (Yes, as usual we are not afraid to link to the competition.)

AppClix is a complete analytics solution that includes detailed sales reporting, and campaign tracking. Some of the features we have that others don’t are:

  • Automatic download of iTunes reports from iTunes Connect for complete sales analysis and reporting
  • Click through tracking with conversion for in app and mobile web ads. We also support traditional web ads which we believe will be huge for iPad application marketing.
  • Reporting on Reviews and Rankings of apps across mutiple app stores in every country available.
  • reporting on how price affects conversions and downloads
  • reporting on how changes to descriptions affect sales
  • reporting on how ranking and review affect sales
  • reporting on referrers when purchases are made from web sites.

These features do NOT require the installation of our library in the mobile application. Signup is instant and reporting is available immediately.

As for our Analytics, we also offer quite a few metrics and features again not available in others.

  • Additional metrics such as
    • conversion rate
    • trial to paid upgrade rates
    • update rates that show what percentage of users update to new versions and from what version they updated.
    • days from last use to new version update
  • Simple OpenFeint integration – We have created a simple OpenFeint service that simply drops into the OpenFeint library for instant analytics integration using same syntax and formats as existing OpenFeint code. For those of you who don’t know about OpenFeint, it is a great community, leaderboard, achievement and application cross promotion solution for iPhone games and apps. We have tried a few solutions, but the OpenFeint community is the largest and has the most robust solution.
  • Real Time Analytics! – Yes, this is possible. We are currently using the Amazon EC2 infrastructure for 95% of our solution and can easily scale to accomodate real time stats. While some of the summary data is updated hourly, event and user data is immediately available. Through our testing, we have been amazed at the lag time some vendors are providing. Data in our Pinch Media integration into the DoodleCopter app has not been updated since February 27th! Yes, 11 days!

pinchdelay.png

(click to enlarge)
They finally put up a note about this, and we will be commenting in additional post shortly.

  • Lastly, AppClix is also available in a dedicated and customer installed solution. Yes, you can purchase AppClix and install on your own servers. No need to compile a third party dependency int your precious apps. (Google AppLoop for reasons why). AppClix is avilable as a complete Amaon EC2 paid AMI so you don’t even need your own hardware. More on this to come.

We’re excited about the new blog and AppClix. We look forward to our reader’s feedback, and the continued growth of this market.

Copyright Mobile Web Analytics – MobileWebAnalytics Blog Has Changed to Mobile Analytics Today!

  • Share/Bookmark

Kill Useless Web Metrics: Apply The “Three Layers Of So What” Test

Posted by Avinash Kaushik | Posted in Case Studies, Web Analytics | Posted on 11-03-2010

0

ThreeData, data everywhere yet nary an insight in sight.

Is that your web analytics existence?

Don’t feel too bad, you share that plight with most citizens of the Web Analytics universe.

The problem? The absolutely astonishing ease with which you can get access to data!

Not to mention the near limitless potential of that data to be added, subtracted, multiplied, and divided to satiate every weird need in the world.

You see just because you can do something does not mean you should do it.

And yet we do.

Like good little Reporting Squirrels we collect and stack metrics as if preparing for an imminent ice age. Rather than being a blessing that stack becomes a burden because we live in times of bright lovely spring and nothing succeeds like being agile and nimble about what we collect, what we give up, and what we deliberately choose to ignore.

The key to true glory is making the right choices.

In this case its making right choices about the web metrics we knight and sent to the battle to come back with insights for our beloved corporation to monetize.

A very simple test can allow you to figure out if the metric you are dutifully reporting (or absolutely in love with) is gold or mud.

It is called the Three Layers of So What test. It was a part of my first book, Web Analytics: An Hour A Day.

What’s this lovely test?

Simple really (occam’s razor!):

Ask every web metric you report the question “so what” three times.

Each question provides an answer that in turn raises another question (a “so what” again). If at the third “so what” you don’t get a recommendation for an action you should take, you have the wrong metric. Kill it.

the three test

This brutal recommendation is to force you to confront this reality: If you can’t take action, some action (any action!), based on your analysis, why are you reporting data?

The purpose of the “so what” test is to undo the clutter in your life and allow you to focus on only the metrics that will help you take action. All other metrics, those that fall into the nice to know or the highly recommended or the I don’t know why I am reporting this but it sounds important camp need to be sent to the farm to live our the rest of their lives!

Ready to rock it?

Let’s check out how you would conduct the “so what” test with a couple of examples.

Key Performance Indicator: Percent of Repeat Visitors.

You run a report and notice a trend for this metric.

Here is how the “so what” test will work:

“The trend of repeat visitors for our website is up month to month.”

So what?

“This is fantastic because it shows that we are a more sticky website now.”

(At this point a true Analysis Ninjas would inquire how that conclusion was arrived at and ask for a definition of sticky, but I digress.)

So what?

“We should do more of xyz to leverage this trend.” (Or yxz or zxy – a specific action based on analysis of what caused the trend to go up.)

So what?

If your answer to that last “so what” is: “I don’t know… isn’t that a good thing… the trend is going up… hmm… I am not sure there is anything we can do… but it is going up right?”

At this point you should cue the sound of money walking out the door.

Bottom-line: This might not be the best KPI for you.

Let me hasten to point out that there are no universal truths in the world (though some religions continue to insist!).

Perhaps when you put your % of Repeat Visitors KPI to the “so what” test you have a glorious action you can take that improves profitability. Rock on! More power to you!

Many Exit Signs

Key Performance Indicator: Top Exit Pages on the Website.

[Before we go on please know that top exit pages is a different measurement than top pages that bounce.]

You have been reporting the top exit pages of your website each month, and to glean more insights you show trends for the last six months.

“These are the top exit pages on our website for the last month.”

So what? They don’t seem to have changed in six months.

“We should focus on these pages because they are major leakage points in our website.”

So what? We have looked at this report for six months and tried to make fixes, and even after that the pages listed here have not dropped off the report.

“If we can stop visitors from leaving the website, we can keep them on our web site.”

So what? Doesn’t everyone have to exit on some page?

The “so what” test in this case highlights that although this metric seems to be a really good one on paper, in reality it provides no insight that you can use to drive action.

Because of the macro dynamics of this website, the content consumption pattern of visitors does not seem to change over time (this happens when a website does not have a high content turnover – like say a rapidly updating news site), and we should move on to other actionable metrics.

Here the “so what” test not only helps you focus your precious energy on the right metric, it also helps you logically walk through measurement to action.

Conversion Rate Efficiency

Key Performance Indicator: Conversion Rate for Top Search Keywords.

In working closely with your search agency, or in-house team, you have produced a spreadsheet that shows the conversion rate for the top search keywords for your website.

“The conversion rate for our top 20 keywords has increased in the last three months by a statistically significant amount.”

So what?

“Our pay-per-click (PPC) campaign is having a positive outcome, and we should reallocate funds to these nine keywords that show the most promise.”

Okay.

That’s it.

No more “so what?”

With just one question, we have a recommendation for action. This indicates that this is a great KPI and we should continue to use it for tracking.

Notice the characteristics of this good KPI:

#1: Although it uses one of the most standard metrics in the universe, conversion rate, it is applied in a very focused way – just the top search keywords. (You can do the top 10 or top 20 or as many “head keywords” as it makes sense in your case, just be aware this does not scale to the “mid” or “tail”.)

#2: It is pretty clear from the first answer to “so what?” that for this KPI the analyst has segmented the data between organic and PPC. This is the other little secret: no KPI works at an aggregated level to by itself give us insights. Segmentation does that.

task completion rate

Key Performance Indicator: Task Completion Rate.

You are using a on-exit website survey tool like 4Q to measure my most beloved metric in whole wide world and the universe: task completion rate. (You’ll see in a moment why. :)

Here’s the conversation…

“Our task completion rate is down five points this month to 58%.”

So what?

“Having indexed our performance against that of last quarter, each one percent drop causes a loss of $80,000 in revenue.”

So what? I mean in the name of thor, what do we do!

“I have drilled down to the Primary Purpose report and most of the fall is from Visitors who were there to purchase on our website, the most likely cause is the call to action on our landing pages and a reported slowness in response when people add to cart.”

Good man. Here’s a bonus and let’s go fix this problem.

Nice right?

Notice in this case you have a inkling to the top super absolutely unknown secret of the web analytics world: If you tie important metrics to revenue that tends get you action and a god like status.

Keep that in mind.

So that’s the story of the “so what” test. A simple yet effective way of identifying the metrics that matter.

This strategy is effective with all that we do, but it is particularly effective when it comes to the normal data puke we call the “management dashboard”. Apply the “so what” test and you’ll make it into a Management Dashboard.

Closing Summary:

Remember, we don’t want to have metrics because they are nice to have, and there are tons of those.

We want to have metrics that answer business questions and allow us to take action—do more of something or less of something or at least funnel ideas that we can test and then take action.

The “so what” test is one mechanism for identifying metrics that you should focus on or metrics that you should ditch because although they might work for others, for you they don’t pass the “so what” test.

And killing metrics is not such a bad thing. After all this is the process that has been proven to work time and time again:

web analytics metrics lifecycle process

More here: Web Metrics Demystified.

Ok now it’s your turn.

Do you have a test you apply to your web metrics? What are your strategies that have rescued you during times of duress? What do you like about the “so what” test? What don’t you like about it? Do you have a metric that magnificently aced the “so what” test?

Please share your comments, feedback and life lessons via comments.

Thanks.

PS:
Couple other related posts you might find interesting:

Kill Useless Web Metrics: Apply The “Three Layers Of So What” Test is a post from: Occam’s Razor by Avinash Kaushik

Copyright Occam’s Razor by Avinash Kaushik – Kill Useless Web Metrics: Apply The “Three Layers Of So What” Test

  • Share/Bookmark

An Exclusive Interview with Paul Pellman – CEO of Click Forensics, Inc.

Posted by SEM Geek | Posted in Case Studies, Search Engine Marketing | Posted on 11-03-2010

0

Paul-pellman-click-forensic SemGeek.com is proud to present an Exclusive Online Interview with Paul Pellman, CEO of Click Forensics

This interview is brought to you in
cooperation with the Search Engine Strategies’
Pre-SES New York 2010 Blog & Q&A Coverage

Interview Questions

Question #1: Can you tell our audience a little more about your role as CEO at Click Forensics? For example, what does a typical day consist of?


Answer: Well, there are no typical days when you’re the CEO of an internet start-up, but that’s what makes it so fun. This is even more true within the fast paced online media industry. We really are in the midst of seminal marketplace changes, which is creating significant opportunities and challenges.


That said, for me it’s about trying to always find balance – between thinking/acting strategically and accomplishing all the day-to-day tactics and to-do’s that need to get done; between driving/focusing the team and working with existing and prospective customers to understand their key problems that we can help solve. No two days are the same; it’s very fast-paced, which is how I like it.

———————————————————————————————–

Question #2: As the Authority in Click Fraud Detection and overall Traffic Quality, can you provide us with any insights, trends, or concerns that you have seen over the past year with regard to overall web traffic? Is there anything we should be aware of for the near future?

Answer: I think the most interesting thing we’ve seen in the CPC space over the past year is that while more companies are focused on the issues around traffic quality, the fraud rate has been pretty constant. We’re actually seeing more sophisticated sources of click fraud emerge. Botnets, malware, and very sophisticated fraud schemes are becoming more common, while the old sources of fraud like competitor fraud and publisher fraud are being successfully prohibited/discovered. So while the click fraud rate looks like it’s been pretty constant over the past years, the complexion of the fraud has changed considerably.


In the near future, we really believe that the traffic quality problems will migrate to the display ad space as well. The advent of DSPs, ad exchanges and yield management platforms, along with the continued proliferation of ad networks means that advertisers and agencies are losing some level of transparency and control over their campaigns. Was my ad shown? Was it seen by the right audience? Did anyone actually see it? Those will become the measures of quality in the display ad world.

———————————————————————————————–

Question #3: What would you say are the biggest challenge(s) facing PPC Advertisers in this highly competitive marketplace?

Answer: The PPC advertising space is no longer the wild west. It’s very data-driven and sophisticated. You can’t just bid up your core keywords and sit back and wait for traffic. Advertisers and agencies are hyper-competitive, so whether you’re talking about long-tail keywords or bid optimization, it requires a lot more work to make sure campaign dollars are well spent. The high ROI of PPC can mask a lot of inefficiencies, but those days are numbered.

———————————————————————————————–

Question #4: Even with Google and Yahoo trying to improve the quality of traffic in their respected Content Networks, there are still problems with Click Fraud and overall traffic quality. In your opinion, how can Click Forensics help the typical advertiser overcome these issues?

Answer: First, let me say that Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft all do a great job at trying to prevent fraud in their advertiser campaigns. And when it does happen, they tend to be very reasonable about providing credits or refunds to advertisers. Our issue has always been that it’s incumbent upon the advertisers to ensure they’re getting what they pay for. Some advertisers simply choose to trust the search engines, and that’s fine. We’d say trust, but verify. Our products help advertisers to verify that they aren’t paying for invalid and fraudulent clicks.

———————————————————————————————–

Question #5: With the emergence of more and more PPC Management Software Companies entering into the industry offering everything from Bid Management to measuring Attribution, how has Click Forensics, positioned itself to be different that the competition?

Answer: Given all the PPC data we see and our relationships with large advertisers, we’ve actually considered whether it would make sense for us to enter the search optimization space (bid management, attribution, etc.). But instead we’ve chosen to focus on our core competency, which is improving traffic quality. That means we often end up providing our service to a different audience than just PPC advertisers. Many of our largest customers are ad networks, publishers, and content aggregators.

They don’t want to deliver poor quality traffic to their advertisers. We help them by filtering out invalid traffic and routing the quality traffic appropriately. We help ad networks to manage their publisher base by focusing on quality providers. So, we’re not a PPC Management company, but we are helping to improve the quality of traffic for PPC advertisers – even for the ones who aren’t our direct customers.

———————————————————————————————–


Question #6: From your unique perspective as CEO with Click Forensics, can you describe for our audience what specific products or services of CF would be most valuable to the typical customer?

Answer: Well, our “typical” customer might be a PPC advertiser, an ad network, or a publisher. There’s no one product that they all buy from us. But all our products are focused on the same issue: improving traffic quality. Click Forensics for Ad Networks helps performance-based ad networks to better serve their advertisers, better monetize their traffic, and eliminate waste in campaigns. We score every click and every source of traffic so that network operators can maximize their profitability.

———————————————————————————————–

Question #7: For existing Click Forensics customers as well as others who might be interested in trying out Click Forensics, do you have any new and exciting enhancements that you would like to announce?

Answer: The most exciting thing we’ve announced recently is that we’re expanding our offerings to the display advertising market. We plan to bring to the display advertising industry what we’ve been providing in the CPC space for years: transparency, verification, and audience quality improvement. Click Forensics has now opened the beta testing program for a new platform that will enable online display advertisers to make impression filtering and ad serving decisions in real-time.

For more info visit: http://www.clickforensics.com/display

Clickforensics-logo

About Paul Pellman:

Paul Pellman is an expert on online audience verification for the search and display advertising industries. He has spoken on the topic at top industry events, including SES, ad:tech and Pubcon. As the CEO of Click Forensics, he oversees the development and delivery of the company’s ad verification offerings, which are used by leading advertisers, agencies, publishers and ad networks.

Before joining Click Forensics, Paul served as executive vice president of Marketing and interim President for Hoover’s, and vice president of Consumer Direct for Terra Lycos. He was also CEO of two early stage start-ups. Paul holds a B.S. in accounting and finance from the University of Arizona and an MBA from Harvard University.



Copyright PPC Blog | Sem Geek – Making Sense of Paid Search Marketing – An Exclusive Interview with Paul Pellman – CEO of Click Forensics, Inc.

  • Share/Bookmark

"I don’t have time for Facebook and Twitter"

Posted by Search Engine Guide | Posted in Case Studies, Search Engine Marketing | Posted on 11-03-2010

0

by Mike Moran

Social media is free, but what’s the catch? Time. We only have so much time to spend putting our message out there, but we don’t want to limit how many people can hear what we have to say. This problem comes up in many ways, but the simplest is the dichotomy between Facebook and Twitter. Many folks decide to spend the bulk of their social time on one or the other, with relatively few people using both. If Google Buzz catches fire, this fragmentation might only increase. What’s a marketer to do?

My social Network on Flickr, Facebook, Twitter...

Image by luc legay via Flickr

Let’s face it. There’s no real difference between “friends” and “followers,” nor between “”status updates” and “tweets.” And why would you decide to spend all your precious social media time updating one venue and not the other, if your customers use both of them? But how can you double the amount of time you spend in social media updating both?

You don’t have to. I decided that I prefer Twitter to Facebook so I have every tweet I send out mirrored as my Facebook status. And I do the same thing on LinkedIn. I haven’t taken the plunge on Google Buzz yet, but I’ll probably do the same thing there, also.

If someone wants to see what I am up to, they can use their favorite method to keep up and I only have to update once. I know people using FriendFeed to accomplish the same thing. In each of your social media lives, you can set up these mirrors to make sure that your customers can keep up no matter what network they are in, while you only need to update once.

Now, I find even though I update in only one place, that I still have trouble making time for more than a few tweets a day, but there isn’t anything I can do to help with that.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Be sure and visit our small business news site.


Copyright Search Engine Guide : Small Business Search Marketing – "I don’t have time for Facebook and Twitter"

  • Share/Bookmark